by Keren Setten
JERUSALEM, May 17 (Xinhua) -- Ahead of a much-anticipated visit by the U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finds himself in the middle of two conflicting interests.
With his political survival at stake, Netanyahu must also find a way to keep his American ally satisfied.
Just days before Trump's visit to Israel and the Palestinian Authority, anticipation is replaced by tension.
In the run-up to the visit of U.S. President Trump to Israel and the Palestinian Authority, it seems tensions are running higher than expected.
Days before his arrival, a diplomatic row between the two countries arose after an American official was quoted as questioning Israel's claim to one of Judaism's holy sites in Jerusalem.
While the two countries will probably be able to overcome this disagreement, the spat highlighted the growing gap between the expectations the Israeli government has of Trump and how the relationship will actually play out.
Gideon Meir, a former senior Israeli diplomat, believes Israel needs to realize Trump is no longer a candidate on the campaign trail but an American president with a different perspective.
"Israel has to come back to reality and to deal with President Trump, the president who sits in the Oval Office, not in the Trump Tower in New York -- it's different," said Meir.
Throughout his campaign, Trump said he would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, which Palestinians see as part of their future state.
But as he settled into the White House, he becomes less decisive on the matter.
Israel annexed East Jerusalem after capturing it in the 1967 Mideast War. While it considers the united city it's capital, the annexation has never been recognized by the international community.
Moving the U.S. embassy to the city would be a highly controversial move that may result in an upsurge in violence in the region.
Netanyahu heads a right-wing coalition with partners that are more hard-line than him. A senior partner, leader of the Jewish Home party, Naftali Bennett, has been vocal against a Palestinian state. His party has demanded Netanyahu make similar statements in front of Trump.
Netanyahu has frequently stated publicly he is in favor of an independent Palestinian state as a result of bilateral negotiations with Israel.
Meir says Netanyahu may publicly demand the move of the embassy in order to appease his coalition and buy himself political stability.
"He wants President Trump to move the embassy to Jerusalem and to try to get to a status quo between Israel and the Palestinians, to continue settlements. He will not insist on a two-state solution, maybe publicly as a lip service he will do it but in reality he wants to survive as Prime Minister. This is his first goal."
On the campaign trail, Trump also said he did not see Israeli settlements in the West Bank as an obstacle to peace between the two rivals.
Palestinians see settlements as a severe impediment to statehood.
After meeting Netanyahu in the White House, Trump moderated his opinion. At a press briefing with the Israeli leader in Washington, the American president told him "to hold off on settlements a little bit."
For Israel's right wing, who thought the new American administration would at the very least turn a blind eye to settlement expansion, the request was the equivalent to a slap in the face.
For the Israeli Prime Minister it was a wake-up call, Trump was not going to make his political life easy.
Netanyahu will be wary to upset his ally during his visit.
The Israeli Prime Minister is coming to realize that Trump's seemingly pro-Israeli stance may actually be a hindrance to his political goal of managing the conflict with the Palestinians without really needing to solve it.
As opposed to the strenuous relationship Netanyahu had with former U.S. President Barack Obama, the Israeli government can no longer say they do not have a sympathetic ally in the White House.
"Netanyahu will do everything in his power not to go into tension with this President," adds Meir.
Ben Caspit, an Israeli political commentator, wrote that such a deal is "nothing short of a nightmare" for the prime minister.