by Xinhua Writer Chen Jipeng
BEIJING, June 12 (Xinhua) -- Some Western countries have pressured China hard lately on the excess capacity in its steel sector, hoping to protect their self-interests and gain more in trade negotiations with China. Whatever interests they pursue, they should be fair-minded.
Excess capacity as an economic term should not be abused. In almost all markets, it is natural for enterprises, especially profitable ones, to maintain some extra capacity. The reason is demand tends to fluctuate over time, and that they want to capture as large a share of the market as they can and make the most when still better time comes.
The huge steel capacity the world has today was spurred by a strong demand in the earlier booming cycle -- both in China and across the world. Many of the steel firms, including those in the United States and Europe, as well as the iron ore exporting economies, benefited from the boom.
At the development stage back then, the Chinese economy happened to be an important driver. But it is nothing to be ashamed of. China's housing market took off in the early 1990s and almost all the 1.3 billion people in the country were housed properly within 20 years.
Even as the rest of the world fell into an economic downturn, the housing demand in China persists, though its growth has been slower. This is mainly because China has a shortage of infrastructure.
Should China be blamed for increasing spending in infrastructure at a time of external economic downturn? In truth, such investment in infrastructure not only helped cushion China from the shock of a sharp slowdown in external demand, but also helped the world economy by contributing demand and growth that the world desperately needed. And most importantly, there was a solid infrastructure demand.
The market cycle is unstoppable. The lower housing demand in China unfortunately coincides with the prolonged sluggish growth across the major advanced economies.
China did not specifically choose to support the steel sector when it increased fiscal spending amid the downturn. Rather, its steel sector expanded thanks to advantages in terms of cost and closeness to the market as well as the strong profitability.
Excess capacity, or rather a weak demand, is a shared challenge. World economies should make concerted efforts to solve it instead of pointing fingers at any one in order to create a pretext for practicing protectionism.
Besides, the Chinese government has long stopped issuing orders for any factories to be set up or shut down. It relies on the market to phase out firms not competitive enough to survive the slowdown cycle.
Related:
Commentary: China committed to cutting steel overcapacity
BEIJING, June 7 (Xinhua) -- China, the world's largest steel producer and consumer, is resolute in its commitment to reducing overcapacity in the sector, although this may result in job losses.
China's industrial overcapacity is a byproduct of the stimulus program implemented during the global financial crisis, during which China contributed about 50 percent to world economic growth. Full story
U.S. investigations into Chinese steel "imprudent": China
BEIJING, May 21 (Xinhua) -- The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has labelled U.S. anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations into steel plates from countries and regions including China "imprudent" and blamed protectionism for the troubles of American steel. Full story
Commentary: China not to blame for crisis in U.S. steel industry
BEIJING, May 18 (Xinhua) -- For years, due to its steel exports, China has been the "dumping scapegoat" of the United States, a convenient excuse for the country to impose anti-dumping tariffs to protect its own sluggish steel industry. Full story
