U.S. expert hails Obama's Afghanistan policy
www.chinaview.cn 2009-07-20 13:58:06   Print

    by Jiang Guopeng

    WASHINGTON, July 19 (Xinhua) -- Hailing President Barack Obama's policy towards Afghanistan as "the right strategy for the first time," Michael O'Hanlon, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, urged the Obama administration to send more troops to fight al-Qaida and the Taliban in the Asian country.

    AFGHANISTAN'S IMPORTANCE

    In an interview with Xinhua, O'Hanlon, who is specialized in defense and foreign policy, said Afghanistan's importance to the United States is greater than it used to be, especially since al-Qaida and the Taliban have been reviving their influence in the country and its neighboring Pakistan, a nuclear-armed country with 170 million people.

    "Al-Qaida likes to have a sanctuary either in Afghanistan or in Pakistan, or along their border ... And if Pakistan is successful at controlling its own territory better in the future, al-Qaida could move right back to Afghanistan," said O'Hanlon.

    Meanwhile, "the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan have begun to emerge and work together, and so if you were to allow Afghanistan to collapse, then it becomes a very convenient sanctuary for fighters who want to attack Pakistan."

    Another reason for the United Stated to beef up security in Afghanistan is, according to O'Hanlon, related to its "moral obligation."

    "There's a perception among many Muslims that the United States doesn't care about Muslims ... We need to convince Muslims around the world that we value their people and we value their religion," he said.

    FIRST RIGHT STRATEGY

    "For a long time, we have considered Afghanistan by itself to be relatively unimportant," said O'Hanlon.

    The administration of George W. Bush paid inadequate attention to it, because as soon as they overthrew the Taliban, they withdrew most of their attention, and refused to add U.S. forces to the area, he said.

    "For six years, seven years, without a strategy that really made much sense, we just somehow hoped the Taliban was not capable of establishing greater strength, and we were wrong." said O'Hanlon.

    According to O'Hanlon, one of the biggest failures of the Bush administration's Afghanistan policy is "we have not been protecting people."

    "You have to stay long enough so that you can protect the population" and help train the police and the army so they can do the job by themselves, said O'Hanlon.

    Amendments are being made by Obama, he said. "It's the right strategy for the first time," he said, referring to the new U.S. strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan presented by Obama on March 27.

    Obama has specified that the new strategy's core goal "must be to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaida and its safe havens in Pakistan, and to prevent their return to Pakistan or Afghanistan."

    The strategy will have no chance of success without "significant increase" of military and civilian deployment, said the president.

    SHIFT? NOT EXACTLY

    As to the so-called "shift" of U.S. strategic focus from Iraq to Afghanistan, O'Hanlon said the word "shift" obviously overstates the real situation in the two countries. "Don't forget we still have 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, and we only have 58,000 in Afghanistan," said O'Hanlon.

    "Here we are in July 2009, six months of the Obama presidency, and we still have twice as many troops in Iraq than in Afghanistan," he said.

    "There isn't this shift, because the shift implies you don't really care about Iraq, just you decide to support Afghanistan; just you flow the forces as fast as you can. But it's now not happening," said O'Hanlon.

    "We are shifting our focus within Iraq from one type of mission to another type of mission ... It is not a shift from Iraq to Afghanistan; it is a shift from a very large presence in Iraq to a more modest presence in Iraq," he added.

    O'Hanlon said 50,000 American troops will remain in Iraq. However, he said the change will not be so dramatic as what Obama has put as "going from a combat role to a training role."

    "In fact, even today we're doing a lot of training, and even after the shift is completed, we will still do some combat, we have capability to do some combat," he said.

    "So this is not an end to the Iraqi operation by any means," said O'Hanlon, adding that its conclusion could hardly be expected before the end of 2011.

Editor: Wang Guanqun
Related Stories
Home World
  Back to Top