BEIJING, March 22 -- James Lovelock is a scientist known for his "Gaia
Hypothesis," after the Greek goddess of the Earth.
In this hypothesis, Lovelock states that the entire mass of living and nonliving matter on Earth functions together in a complex, interdependent system that can be viewed
as a "living entity."
The Gaia, our Earth, is very ill, and is becoming even sicker due to global
warming.
Lovelock's "The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth Is Fighting Back -- and How
We Can Still Save Humanity" concludes that mankind has passed the point at which
it is possible to reverse the dangerous effects of global warming.
"If we fail to take care of the Earth, it surely will take care of itself
by making us no longer welcome," the book warns.
This view of interdependence is a drastic departure from prevailing
perception, implied or otherwise, of humans as conquerors of the nature.
Lovelock's vision somewhat approaches traditional Chinese attitudes, as
expressed by sage Chuang Tzu.
He believed that since humans are born of nature, live in it, and will
return to it, "I" is part of nature. Just as you do not give more weight to one
bodily function over others, the stress of pitting oneself against nature is
ridiculous.
The sage thus laments the man who (in Burton Watson's translation) is
"sometimes clashing with things, sometimes bending before them. He runs his
course like a galloping steed, and nothing can stop him."
"Sweating and laboring to the end of his days and never seeing his
accomplishment, utterly exhausting himself and never knowing where to look for
rest -- can you help pitying him?" Chuang Tzu wonders.
Much of human strife conjures up an image of an Antaeus (titan) trying hard
to cut his nexus with mother Earth.
Chuang Tzu's vision of human beings as part of nature has important
implications for Chinese.
For instance, it explains why traditional Chinese dwellings emphasize
oneness with nature, and the modern "comfort" of living confined to an stuffy,
air-conditioned highrise or a moving metal box -- all the while poisoning the
air -- is incomprehensible.
This insight into human nature ensures that the Earth's relatively simple
homeostatic mechanisms work, since "The Earth System behaves as a single,
self-regulating system comprised of physical, chemical, biological and human
components," a consensus reached by scientists at a climate-change conference in
2001.
Lovelock makes it clear that Gaia's ability to self-regulate is at risk.
"The humanist concept of sustainable development and the Christian concept
of stewardship are flawed by unconscious hubris," Lovelace claims.
If we conceive of this life like that of a sparrow that flies into the
warmth and light of the feasting hall from the darkness and storms outside, and
then flies out again into darkness through the opposite door, we have little
incentives not to make the most of our brief stay in the feasting hall.
Although Chinese society is partly characterized by the absence of
institutionalized religion, this has always been balanced by our strong bond to
our posterity, and this empowered view of our life as an endless stream
infinitely enhances our awareness of our responsibilities.
In his diary for December 16, 1923, scholar Hu Shih recorded an exchange
with one of the most revered contemporary classical scholars Wang Guowei, who
believed that Western preoccupation with desires would in time lead to
destruction and catastrophe.
Hu Shih, while less pessimistic, claims that "we have no choice but to head
to this direction too."
Lovelock warns that a dangerous state of "Positive Feedback" can have
disastrous consequences.
In positive feedback, the response is to amplify the change in the
variable. This has a de-stabilizing effect.
Among such instances are the "ice albedo feedback," in which the melting of
snow-covered ground would accelerate the earth's warming.
"The planet we live on has merely to shrug to take some fraction of a
million people to their deaths," Lovelace warns.
Yet Lovelock's capacity as a scientist also dramatically limits his vision.
He still takes comfort in technological fixes, in his belief that "only
nuclear power can now halt global warming."
He also proposes that nations should begin planning to synthesize food from
available materials.
(Source: Shanghai Daily/By Wan Lixin)