BEIJING, Aug. 23 (Xinhua) -- The lightening Usain
Bolt and other Jamaican sprint aces helped their country win six gold medals in
Beijing, but they could never think that also raises the Caribbean island atop
on the medal tally.
At least one Australian researcher thinks so. Simon
Forsyth, from Brisbane, ranked Jamaica first in his Beijing Olympic medal tally
by population, highly ahead of China and the United States.
 |
|
Usain Bolt of Jamaica jubilates after the men's 200m final at the National Stadium, also known as the Bird's Nest, during Beijing 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China, Aug. 20, 2008. Usain Bolt of Jamaica won the title with 19.30 seconds and set a new world record. (Xinhua/Guo Dayue) Photo Gallery>>> |
In his "gold medal tally by per million population",
Jamaica was winning with 2.1582 as of Saturday afternoon. The runner-up is
Bahrain and Estonia the third. China was 45th, the United States was 31st and
Russia 26th.
Forsyth also provides total medal tally and weighted
medal score both by per million population. Jamaica still holds the top. And the
"Giant 3" China, the United States and Russia, lag in distance, too.
Forsyth's own country, Australia, ascends top 10 in
those three tallies, but trails some "small countries" like Bahamas and
Slovenia.
India, the second most-populated country in the
world, ranks last in all three tallies.
Forsyth began publishing the Olympic medals per
population results since the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. Part of his work at the
School of Population Health, University of Queensland is data manipulation, so
he was able to scrape the medal information and produce the results fairly
easily.
 |
|
Asafa Powell, Michael Frater, Nesta Carter and Usain Bolt (L to R)of Jamaica pose for photos by the results board with their new world record after the men's 4x100m relay final at the National Stadium, also known as the Bird's Nest, during Beijing 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China, Aug. 22, 2008. The Jamaican team won the title with 37.10 seconds and set a new world record. (Xinhua/Liao Yujie) Photo Gallery>>> |
"My reason for producing and discussing the per
population rankings are simple: to show people there is more than one way to
look at results, and the first, most obvious way a person looks at results
usually does not mean what they think it means," he said in an email.
Another reason driving Forsyth could be the "loud
clowns", as he said, that "the USA is the best at sports in the world" or "the
best athletes all come from the USA".
"What does winning the biggest count of medals at the
Olympics mean?" he asks, "Simply that your country won more medals than anyone
else."
"Does this high count mean your country is the best
at sport, or has the best athletes, or is the fittest nation? Not at all."
Forsyth explains that through the per population
results he was not trying to say the Bahamas and Norway are better at sport.
"The only thing you can draw from this is that The Bahamas won more gold medals
per population than any other country."
"The real problem comes when people try to read more
meaning into a ranking than there really is," said he.
"Yes, the per population ranking is flawed as a
measure of sporting performance," Forsyth admits, "but I would argue that the
simple sum medal ranking is at least as flawed."
The U.S. media ranks delegations by the total medals
they win, and Uncle Sam tops that table though the Chinese win much more gold
medals. The rest of the world counts the table by golds.
Every one should be proud that his or her country
wins more medals than anyone else, Forsyth believes. Meanwhile, "Should you be
proud that your country won more medals per population than any other country?
Yes, at least equally so."
The web address of Forsyth's tally is
http://simon.forsyth.net/olympics.html, which updates every 15 minutes if the
results from the official site have changed.