Special report:
2008 Olympic
Games
By Tan
Haojun
BEIJING, July 30 -- To control the air
pollution and ensure smooth transportation during the forthcoming Olympic Games,
Beijing, the host city, has taken numerous measures.
One of them that caught my attention was that 30
percent of the cars owned by the central administration, city government,
institutions affiliated to government, businesses and factories in Beijing were
banned from the road between July 1 and July 19. The figure becomes 70 percent
from July 20 to September 20, taking the number of off-road vehicles owned by
these institutions to 210,000.
 |
|
Fountain water spray in front of the National Stadium, nicknamed the "Bird's Nest", in Beijing, China, July 29, 2008. The sky cleared after a rainfall in some areas of the capital Tuesday.(Xinhua Photo) Photo Gallery>>> |
A simple arithmetic tells us that the total numbers
of cars owned by governments, businesses and other institutions are at least
300,000 in Beijing. How much do these cars cost for maintenance and daily use?
If the average expenditure on purchasing a car is
250,000 yuan (36,765 dollars), it takes 75 billion yuan (11 billion U.S.
dollars) for 300,000 cars. If 10 percent of these cars are to be replaced every
year, it costs at least 7.5 billion.
When the cars are used, each of them costs at least
40,000 yuan annually for maintenance, insurance, petroleum and other expenses,
which brings the total amount to 12 billion yuan. The salary of drivers for
these cars is about 900,000 yuan.
Putting all these figures together, the 300,000 cars
need an expenditure of around 20 billion yuan (3.97 billion dollars) every year.
These are the figures for cars owned by institutions
in Beijing.
If we assume that the number of cars owned by local
governments, institutions, State-owned enterprises and businesses in each
province, municipality and autonomous region is about half of that in Beijing,
the total expenses of purchasing these cars are close to 1 trillion yuan and the
maintenance costs are at least 40 billion every year.
At least half of these cars belong to governments at
all levels and institutions affiliated to or partially paid by the government,
which means at least 50 percent of the huge money is on the administrative
bills.
As a matter of fact, a question has been lingering on
the minds of many since the traffic control measures became effective: if these
cars could be banned from the road during the Olympic Games and the officials
could switch to public transportation and bicycle or even go to work on foot,
could they also do this after the Games?
If the number of cars is reduced to half, the
government could be relieved of at least half of the expenditure spent on the
cars. Progresses could be made in many areas, like education, medical service,
affordable housing, living allowances for disadvantaged groups, if the money is
earmarked for these sectors.
As a result, the common people would have much less
headaches in their lives thanks to the frugality of government officials.
If the administrative and the institutions can
function well during the Games without their cars, it is not wrong to say that
these cars are not indispensable to their work. Therefore, the Olympic Games
could be a good opportunity to explore the possibility of launching a thorough
reform to reduce the car expenses on government bills.
Corruption could take many forms. Accepting bribes is
of course a corruption, and taking privilege from one's official power is also
corruption.
When the officials enjoy their rides in cars at the
State expenses, how many of them are really rushing on emergencies? I am afraid
many of the cars are abused for individual uses and most officials actually
enjoy the benefits from their power.
As a matter of fact, officials could also take a bus
or the subway, ride a bicycle, or walk to work, and such a change in
transportation vehicles should not influence their performance or efficiency.
Therefore, it is strongly advisable that we seize the
good opportunity offered by the Olympic Games to assess the benefits and losses
of reducing government cars. The central government departments should start it
before others. By cutting the number of cars they own, they could save quite
some money for better use.
When the time is right, the government could also
reduce the government expenditures on entertainment, office operations and other
aspects. When more fiscal revenue is spent on improving public welfare, the
government would substantially improve its image among the public.
(Source: China Daily)
 |
|
A helicopter flies over the National Stadium, nicknamed the "Bird's Nest", in Beijing, China, July 29, 2008. The sky cleared after a rainfall in some areas of the capital Tuesday. (Xinhua Photo) Photo Gallery>>> |
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]