Backgrounder: Key facts
about G8 summit
Backgrounder: Toyako, venue
for 2008 G8 summit
BEIJING, July 9 (Xinhua) -- With leaders of developed
and emerging economies unable to agree on emissions targets during a special
climate change summit held at a Japanese mountain resort, which capped off the
annual Group of Eight (G8) summit, Chinese economists here endorsed the stance
of developing countries.
They said it would be "unreasonable" and "unfair" if
developing countries had to accept equal responsibility on emissions-reductions
targets set by the G8 industrial powers.
 |
|
Chinese President Hu Jintao (6th R)
poses with other leaders for the G8 leaders', Africa and International
Organizations family photo at Toyako in Hokkaido, north Japan, on July 9,
2008. (Xinhua Photo) Photo Gallery>>> |
COMMON CHALLENGE,
DIFFERENT RESPONSIBILITIES
"It can not be denied that developed countries
generated more emissions than emerging economies, no matter whether it was in
the past or at present," said Gao Huiqing, head of the development strategy
section under the forecast department of the State Information Center.
The major factor behind what is described as man-made
climate change was the abundant and unchecked greenhouse gas emissions from
developed countries over the past 200 years while they enjoyed the fruits of
industrialization and high economic growth, according to a report by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations.
The report had served as the basis for the UN
framework on climate change that upholds "the principle of common but
differentiated responsibilities" for developing and developed countries to cope
with climate change.
Zhang Yansheng, head of the Research Institute of
Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation under the National Development and Reform
Commission, said developed countries should definitely take more responsibility
to cut emissions since they still consume more energy than developing countries.
"The per capita energy consumption in the United
States is at present roughly 10 times that of China, and that of more
energy-conscious Japan still quintuples China's figure," Zhang said.
However, there had been increasing calls from the
developed world to put emerging countries under certain obligations to cut
emissions as well.
"The focus on developing countries like China came
along with the rapid development of these economies in the process of
globalization," said Zhuang Jian, a senior economist at the Beijing office of
the Asian Development Bank.
But economists all agreed that global warming was a
global challenge, and rich and developing countries shared responsibility in
addressing the issue, echoing comments by Chinese President Hu Jintao at Toyako,
Japan.
"As countries represented at this meeting differ in
terms of their stage of development, level of scientific and technological
development and national conditions, our endeavor to combat climate change
should be guided by the principle of common but differentiated
responsibilities," Hu said on Wednesday.
The meeting was also attended by leaders from
Australia, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, the Republic of Korea
and the G8 nations.
Zhang also stressed that rich and developing nations
should be treated differently in cutting emissions. "Equal responsibilities are
unfair, as it would seem like demanding less from developed countries."
Developing countries, which lag in technology and
management, were actually incapable of making the same commitments, he added.
Chinese companies could be easily overwhelmed with
tasks to introduce green technologies to protect the environment and save
energy, because their profit margins are limited, he said.
"More substantial damage could be done to the
environment as some people, forced out of employment in a bad economy, might
choose to chop down trees for fuel in extreme cases."
Zhuang said overly strict emissions reduction targets
could cost the "right to develop" for emerging economies.
He believed a more rational way for developing
countries to contribute to emissions reduction would be to explore more
environment-friendly approaches in their industrialization.
