BEIJING, April 30 (Xinhuanet) -- U.S. District Court
Judge Claudia Wilken of Oakland, California, ruled Monday that the Bush
administration must publish a final decision about whether to add the polar bear
to the endangered species list.
It's been more than three years
since a California conservation group asked the federal government to protect
polar bear habitat threatened by global warming.
 |
|
A polar bear jumps into the water at
St-Felicien Wildlife Zoo in St-Felicien, Quebec March 6,
2008.(Xinhua/Reuters Photo) Photo Gallery>>>
|
Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity,
lead author of the listing petition submitted in 2005, hailed the judge's order
which short-circuits political interference to a decision.
Andrew Wetzler of the Natural Resources Defense
Council blamed the Bush administration of violating the Endangered Species Act
by its delaying politics.
A delay, he said, likely has been motivated by an
administration desire to see offshore lease sales continue as far as possible
without additional polar bear protections.
An "endangered" declaration would also curtail
development of polar bear habitat in the Arctic by oil and gas companies.
Ironically, global warming will open up some new territory to oil and gas
exploration (at the same time that oil and gas machinery will have trouble
getting around on some formerly frozen tundra).
Last week, Canada declared that it has a special
concern for the icon of the Arctic, but that polar bears are not threatened with
extinction.
About two-thirds of the world's polar bears reside in
Canada. Coincidentally, the U.S. Geologic Survey has warned that melting Arctic
sea ice threatens two-thirds of the world's polar bears with extinction by
mid-century.
The decision to protect, or not protect, the polar
bear has huge policy implications for both countries. Not only does
acknowledging the plight of the polar bear formally mean acknowledging the fact
of global warming, but it would presumably require governments to do something
about curtailing the pollution causing global warming.
"Today's decision is a huge victory for the polar
bear," said Kassie Siegel "By May 15th the polar bear should receive the
protections it deserves under the Endangered Species Act, which is the first
step toward saving the polar bear and the entire Arctic ecosystem from global
warming."
(Agencies)¡¡
Canada: polar bear threatened, doesn't
face extinction
BEIJING, April 28 (Xinhuanet) -- A scientific committee
advising Canada's government on Friday said the survival of the polar bear is
threatened by climate change, but the species does not face extinction.
The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada determined the polar bear was a "special concern species" because
evidence wasn't strong enough to recommend elevating the polar bear's status to
threatened or endangered. Full story