Special report: Dalai clique's separatist activities condemned
BEIJING, March 30 (Xinhua) -- A Tibetologist on
Sunday refuted the "middle way" approach repeatedly advocated by the Dalai Lama
since the 1980s, saying that what the Dalai clique really wants is still "Tibet
independence."
"Greater Tibet" and "high-level autonomy" are the
core contents of the "middle way" claims, but they are neither reasonable nor
acceptable, said Zhu Xiaoming, of the Beijing-based China Tibetology Research
Center.
By "Greater Tibet," the Dalai clique wants not only
the present Tibet Autonomous Region, but also the entire region of the adjacent
Qinghai Province and parts of Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan provinces and Xinjiang
Uygur Autonomous Region.
Theses areas altogether occupy up to 2.4 million
square kilometers, or about a quarter of Chinese territory.
"The so-called 'Greater Tibet' has no historical
foundation, no matter what perspective you look at it from, administrative
division, religion or ethnic groups," Zhu said.
There has never been such a "Greater Tibet" region
governed by the local government of Tibet or the Dalai Lama in history, even
before 1959, he said.
"Besides, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is actually a
multi-ethnic region. Apart from Tibetans, there are more than 10 ethnic groups
living on the plateau for generations, such as Han, Hui, Mongolian, Tu, Monba
and Lhoba," he said.
The expert pointed out that by preaching "Greater
Tibet," the Dalai clique wants to draw together his followers from regions other
than Tibet and win support, sympathy in the world to pave the way for secession
-- many people in the world do not know that various other ethnic groups are
living on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in addition to Tibetans.
"The real purpose for the Dalai clique to give up
saying 'Tibet independence' but advocate 'Greater Tibet' is to shift their
secessionist activities from abroad to home and regain their power in religion
and politics in Tibet," Zhu said.
By "high-level autonomy," he said, what the Dalai
clique really wants is to deny China's system of people's congresses and system
of regional ethnic autonomy, but restore theocracy in Tibet, featuring the
dictatorship by monks and the noble.
In that society, more than 90 percent of the means of
production, such as farmland, pasture, livestock and tools, are controlled by
officials, the noble and senior monks, while the people, or the serf, have
nothing, he said.
"The feudal serfdom regime headed by the Dalai Lama
has been replaced by the democratic government established by the Tibetan people
themselves for a long time. The destiny and future of Tibet will no longer be
decided by the Dalai clique, but by the whole of the Chinese people including
the Tibetan people," Zhu said.