Fossil fin shows evolution of limbs for walking
www.chinaview.cn 2007-08-02 15:57:38   Print

    BEIJING, Aug. 2 (Xinhuanet) -- A 400 million-year-old fossilized coelacanth fin is providing insight into how fins evolved into limbs for walking on land because the arrangement of bones within the fin match the patterns found in living ray-finned fishes, not present-day coelacanths.

    Scientists found the 4-inch-long (10-centimeter-long) specimen at Beartooth Butte in northern Wyoming and have named the fish Shoshinia arctopteryx after the Shoshine people and the Shoshone National Forest. When alive, the fish would have been about 18 to 24 inches (46 to 62 centimeters) in length

    Until now, scientists had assumed the living coelacanths and their relatives, the lungfish, served as accurate models of their ancestors dating back hundreds of millions of years ago.

    "Two living fossils, coelacanths and lungfishes, are in fact not primitive," said lead author Matt Friedman of the University of Chicago. "They are specialized, and they are not particularly good models for understanding the origin of limbs."

    Actually, living coelacanths are adapted for deep-water environments off the coasts of India and Africa where they use a specialized organ in their nose to detect weak electrical signals from prey buried in the mud along the seafloor.

    Unlike fins on living coelacanths and lungfishes, the fossil fin has an asymmetrical pattern in which there are more bones on the front of the central shaft than the back. It has more in common with the anatomy of four-limbed vertebrates, called tetrapods, and even humans than it does with the anatomy of living coelacanths.

    The discovery of the new fossil means scientists can no longer make inferences about the evolution of limbs based on living coelacanths and lungfishes.

    "To understand the developmental evolution of the limbs of tetrapods, we shouldn't be looking at the fins of our nearest living fish relatives ¡ª lungfishes and coelacanths ¡ª because they're far too specialized," said co-author Michael Coates, a University of Chicago biologist.

    (Agencies) 

Editor: Gareth Dodd
Related Stories
Home Sci & Tech
  Back to Top