Tools:Print|E-mail Us|Most Popular
U.S. federal judge overturns 1998 online porn law
www.chinaview.cn 2007-03-23 08:58:02
  Adjust font size:

(File Photo)
Photo Gallery>>>

    BEIJING, March 23 (Xinhuanet) -- A U.S. federal judge has overturned the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), a 1998 law designed by former President Clinton to control Internet pornography and keep children from inappropriate material on the Internet, media reported Friday.

    In the decision overturning COPA, Judge Lowell Reed Jr. of the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia wrote that although he sympathized with the goal of restricting minors from seeing pornography, other means that were less restrictive of free speech, like software filters, were available to block such content.

    A preliminary injunction was granted in February 1999 and upheld by the Supreme Court in February 2004.

    Following the Supreme Court's decision, the case was sent back to Reed for fact finding to determine, among other things, whether Internet filtering technologies and other measures were more effective and less restrictive than COPA.

    Reed acknowledged that Congress "apparently intended" COPA to apply to commercial photographers. But he ruled that the actual wording of the law is broad enough that mainstream publishers could "fear prosecution."

    Enacted on Oct. 21, 1998, COPA provided for criminal and civil penalties against Web sites that failed to take adequate measures to prevent minors from accessing sexually explicit material. Under the law, sites with such content were required to verify the age of those accessing the material, via credit cards for instance, or some other proof of age. Site operators that failed to take such precautions were subject to fines of up to 50,000 U.S. dollars and jail terms of up to six months.

    COPA represents Congress' second attempt to restrict sexually explicit material on the Internet. The Supreme Court in 1997 rejected the Communications Decency Act, which targeted "indecent" or "patently offensive" material, as unconstitutional.

    (Agencies)

Editor: Feng Tao
Tools:Print|E-mail Us|Most Popular
Related Stories
Home Sci/Tech
  Back to Top