Astronomical debate arises from redefinition of planets
www.chinaview.cn 2006-08-21 16:09:58

Some 3,000 astronomers are now dabating in Prague, the Czech Republic, and expected to vote on Friday a newly proposed definition of "planet."

File Photo Photo Gallery >>>

    BEIJING, Aug. 21 (Xinhuanet) -- Some 3,000 astronomers are now dabating in Prague, the Czech Republic, and expected to vote on Friday a newly proposed definition of "planet."

    For the first time, a high-level committee of the International Astronomical Union was recommending the word "planet" be officially defined according to both scientific and historic standards -- every round object orbiting the sun is a planet, unless it orbits another planet.

    The committee also said it is considering giving planet status to "a dozen or two" more objects discovered in recent years, including far away, planet-like bodies informally named Sedna, Quaoar, Orcus, Varuna and Ixion.

    A planet, said the committee headed by Harvard astronomer Owen Gingerich, is an object that orbits a star like the sun; is massive enough so its own gravity keeps it roughly round; and isn't a satellite of another planet, like the moon.

    However, opponents complained the definition just confuses matters further, declaring new planets that are smaller than Earth's moon. Worse, under the new definition, dozens of planets could be added as other objects are found at the outer edges of the solar system.

    For instance, Xena, the so-called 10th planet. Michael Brown of Caltech and other scientists discovered it three years ago and have since found many more, which some astronomers argued are not entitled to be called planets.

    Xena and other comets all lie millions of miles beyond Neptune and Pluto in what is known as the Kuiper Belt, where countless comets are born and still more planet-like objects await discovery.

    Pluto is also within the Kuiper Belt but has been accepted as a planet by virtually all astronomers since its discovery in 1930.

    "I'm totally confused," Brown said. "They say Xena's a planet, but Sedna and Quaoar also fit the definition, so why aren't they being called planets, too?"

    "And Charon's a satellite of Pluto, so why is it a planet? It's not, it's a moon. That committee's definition is an effort to combine science and culture, and it doesn't do either."

    Brown said that with all the new round orbiting objects that his team and other astronomers have detected in the Kuiper Belt, the number of planets should total at least 53 -- not the paltry dozen the committee is recommending.

    In truth, the solar neighborhood started going downhill with the admission of Pluto. Less than half the size of Mercury, it orbits outside the plane of the other recognized planets and has long been considered a questionable addition. Enditem

    (Agencies)

Editor: Zhu Ling
E-mail Us Print This Article
Related Stories