As its internal transport infrastructure expands
rapidly, Tibet is looking forward to eventual rail and road links with India and
other neighboring countries to promote greater cross-border trade and tourism.
Once it develops tourist facilities near Kailash
Manasarovar, Tibet will be ready to receive a lot more Indian pilgrims in
Western Tibet than today, a senior official of Tibet Autonomous Region said.
Speaking to a group of visiting Indian journalists
here, Lhosang Gyaltsen, vice chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region, said the
development of transport infrastructure in Tibet "will have a great impact on
the economic development of the whole region."
Once the rail line, built at enormous cost and amidst
international controversy, is formally opened in 2007, the emphasis will be on
extending it to rest of Tibet, Gyaltsen said.
Earlier reports had indicated that plans already
exist for taking the rail line to the Nepal border. Gyaltsen was underlining
Tibet's natural interest in using the new railway to deepen its connectivity to
the subcontinent, particularly to India and Nepal.
While his enthusiasm may be tempered by the realities
of the Sino-Indian border dispute in Tibet, Gyaltsen was underlining the growing
hopes in the region to prosper through cross-border connectivity and contact.
Having brought the rail line all the way and against
great odds to Lhasa, it makes little sense for Tibet to stop there.
Given the low population density of Tibet, the logic
would inevitably lead to integration with the rail networks of the Indo-Gangetic
plains.
While Beijing and New Delhi might want to carefully
consider the consequences of opening up the Sino-Indian border, there is no
doubt where the interests of the people across the frontier lie.
There has been a growing demand in Ladakh to use the
Demchok tract to facilitate road travel to Kailash Manasarovar. Responding to
the demand in Leh last week, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh promised to take up
the issue with China.
"I have to admit that the infrastructure in Western
Tibet near Kailash Manasarovar is relatively poorer in comparison to Lhasa,"
Gyaltsen said. "We will make efforts to build infrastructure in Western Tibet as
soon as possible."
Currently, Indian tourists go to Kailash Manasarovar
through a government organised trek or through Nepal. The annual Indian tourist
flow to Tibet of 500 stands in sharp contrast to the total of 1.3 million
tourists in Tibet last year.
With a border that runs longer than 3,500 km, many in
India would want to know why they are being denied easier access to Tibet. On
its part, Tibet is ready.
"We dedicate ourselves to opening up to the world," Gyaltsen
said.