The signed article, written by Yedor, has analyzed the "middle way", advocated by Dalai Lama in recent years, pointing out that the so-called "middle way" actually goes against China's Constitution and law.

    At the end of 2005, when Dalai Lama was interviewed by reporters, he said: "Tibet enjoys the right to special treatment in accordance with the Law on National Regional Autonomy", but "this right has not been really enjoyed."

    Sangdong, the chief Galoon, or "premier", of the Tibetan government-in-exile recently said "the policy of the national regional autonomy is very important, but the Chinese Government lacks fairness in following the policy, which does not conform to the Law on National Regional Autonomy".

    They impress people that Dalai Lama favors the national regional autonomy but wishes to see the fulfillment of various rights specified in the law, says the article.

    However, Dalai Lama has also said: "The course of real peace can only begin when the Communist troops have all pulled out". "A regional peace conference should be convened to guarantee demilitarization in Tibet".

    Recently, Dalai Lama entrusted a professor in Hong Kong to draft a document called "limitations and possibilities of achieving 'high-level autonomy' within the framework of the Chinese Constitution and the Law on National Regional Autonomy", which outlines a Tibetan "peace zone" where "no troops should be deployed".

    But it is well known in the world that deploying troops in its own territories is a requirement of national defense and also a symbol of sovereignty. Withdrawing its troops from its own territory so as to turn that part of its territory into a "peace zone" will not be approved by any country upholding its sovereignty and dignity in the world. Neither will China, the article says.