|
Special report: Snap general election in Thailand
BANGKOK, April 28 (Xinhua) -- Thailand's three top courts on Friday failed
to reach a common ground regarding whether to nullify this month's parliamentary
election in the wake of the King's advice for them to find a solution to the
constitutional quagmire.
After a two-hour close-door meeting, judges from the Supreme, Constitution
and Administrative courts has not clinched a conclusion on the legitimacy of
April 2 election.
The judges agreed that each respective court should operate in an
independent, timely and consistent manner in reaching their verdicts with the
benefit of the country in mind, Supreme Court spokesman Jaran Pakdeethanakul
told a news conference.
Each courts need to deliberate the complaints already filed contesting the
fairness of the election process and handle cases within their own jurisdiction.
No indication of how long the process would take has been given, said Charan.
Earlier reports said that judges from the three top courts appear split
over how to rule on the April 2 election after they took note of the King's
advice.
They thought a court injunction alone would not break the deadlock since the
problem was too complex to be tackled purely on the basis of law.
In a rarely public remarks Tuesday night, King Bhumibol Adulyadej ruled out
the possibility to appoint a new prime minister to steer the country through
political reforms as the opposition has request.
He criticized the ongoing political mess as the current ballots would not
produce a legitimate Parliament. The King considered one-party race as
undemocratic and urged the judges from the three courts to find a solution to
the crisis.
It is the king's first direct intervention since 1992 when he stepped in to
end a bloody confrontation between people power protesters and a military
government.
The speech aroused expectations that the election results would be canceled
and pave the way for a fresh parliamentary polling.
Deputy Thai Rak Thai (TRT) leader Sudarat Keyuraphan said his party was
willing to take any recommendation made by the judges.
The main opposition parties on Thursday filed a petition urgingthe Administrative Court
to nullify recent parliamentary elections and to take legal action
against caretaker Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra following his allegedly
unconstitutional dissolution of the House of Representatives.
The parties were ready to contest the next general election and act in line
with any solutions suggested by the relevant courts, they said.
A group of law lecturers from Thammasat University and some senators also
wanted the elections invalidated on grounds that they were called to benefit the
ruling party and that small parties were paid to contest the polls.
The People's Coalition for Democracy (PAD), a coalition which has unseated
Thaksin from office through months of protests, said it would accept a court
ruling on whether to hold new elections, even if the outgoing premier appears on
the ballot. The coalition insisted on holding another rally at Sanam Luang on
May 2.
After Thursday's meeting of 234 judges, the Supreme Court deemed the April
2 election lack legitimacy from the beginning andthe electoral process was
flawed with a large number of protest votes.
The majority of judges in the Constitution Court are, however, against
invalidation of the election, saying it will only prolong the political
uncertainty.
The courts have repeatedly refused to step into the crisis before the King
gave instructions. There has been a long history of the military intervening in
the political disputes in Thailand before the reformist 1997 Constitution.
Thaksin called the snap election three years ahead to defuse protracted
street protests demanding his resignation over claims of corruption and abuse of
power.
Despite TRT's victory in the election, which also left 40 seats unfilled, a strong
protest votes force Thaksin to step aside and handed over the day-to-day power
to Deputy Prime Minister Chitchai Wannasathit. But critics say Thaksin is
intriguing a comeback by reining the ruling party behind scenes.
Marred by a civil disobedience campaign and low turnout, last Saturday's
by-election saw four small parties beat the TRT to win in 9 out of the total 40
constituencies, while candidates from theruling party acquired seats in 17
constituencies.
The Law prevents parliament from convening until a quorum is reached. But
14 seats remain empty after two rounds of balloting. The second by-election has
been slated for Saturday in 14 constituencies in the South, but unopposed TRT
candidates were unlikely to win in the democratic strongholds.
Analysts say even if the snap poll is nullified, what will happen afterwards is much harder to foresee. No quick solution seems in sight to cure the prolonged political crisis which has inflicted the country with painful sufferance. Enditem |