|
Special report: Iran nuclear issue
 |
| United States Permanent Representative to
the United Nations John Bolton (1st L) talks with his Russian counterpart
Andrey Denisov (3rd L) during a UN Security Council meeting on Iran's
nuclear issue at the UN headquarters in New York March 29, 2006. The UN
Security Council unanimously adopted a presidential statement March 29,
calling on Iran to resume suspension of all uranium enrichment-related
activities within 30 days. (Xinhua
Photo) | UNITED NATIONS, March
29 (Xinhua) -- After three weeks of intense negotiations, the UN Security
Council unanimously adopted a presidential statement Wednesday afternoon calling
on Iran to resume suspension of all uranium enrichment-related activities within
30 days.
The statement was passed after the five permanent
council members -- the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia
--reached agreement on the text earlier in the day ending three weeks of
haggling over its contents.
In the statement, cosponsored by the EU trio --
Britain, France and Germany, the council noted "with serious concern" that the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) "is unable to conclude that there are
no undeclared nuclear materials or activities in Iran."
The council called upon Iran to take steps required
by the IAEA to build confidence in the exclusively peaceful purpose of its
nuclear program and to resolve outstanding questions.
It also "underlines ... the particular importance of
re-establishing full and sustained suspension of all enrichment-related and
reprocessing activities, including research and development, to be verified by
the IAEA."
The council requests IAEA Director-General Mohamed
Elbaradei to deliver in 30 days a new report to the IAEA board of governors and
the Security Council on Iran's compliance with IAEA demands, including the
suspension of its enrichment activities.
The EU troika originally set a fortnight timeframe
for Iran to comply with IAEA requirements, but it had to be extended due to
strong opposition from Russia.
Chinese Ambassador Wang Guangya told Xinhua after the
adoption that the statement supports diplomatic efforts to solve the Iranian
nuclear issue.
 |
| Chinese Permanent Representative to the
United Nations Wang Guangya speaks to reporters at the UN headquarters in
New York March 29, 2006. The UN Security Council held a meeting on Iran's
nuclear issue March 29. It unanimously adopted a presidential statement
calling on Iran to resume suspension of all uranium enrichment-related
activities within 30 days. (Xinhua Photo) |
"The statement sends a strong message to support the
authority of the IAEA and to support all diplomatic efforts that will lead to a
diplomatic solution," he stressed.
He called upon all sides concerned, including the EU
troika and Russia, to further accelerate steps of diplomatic efforts outside the
Security Council.
Wang's Russian counterpart Andrei Denisov echoed his
position, saying the IAEA must continue to play "a central role in verifying all
the evidence on the purpose and nature of the Iranian nuclear program."
He stressed that there was no evidence that Tehran
was intent on building nuclear weapons, adding that "for the time being, we have
strong suspicions about intentions, but only suspicions."
However, diplomats from western countries advocated
that the unanimous approval send a strong message that Iran has to comply with
the requests made by the IAEA.
"The ball is now back in Iran's court," French
Ambassador to the UN Jean-Marc de la Sabliere told reporters after the council
approved the statement.
"Iran has 30 days. We hope that Iran will comply," he
noted. "If Iran doesn't comply, then the Security Council will have to take its
responsibilities."
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday
that the adoption of the statement demonstrated that "the international
community is united in its concern over Iran's nuclear program."
"The Security Council's Presidential Statement sends
an unmistakable message to Iran that its efforts to conceal its nuclear program
and evade its international obligations are unacceptable," she said in a
statement.
After the text was adopted, Iran's UN envoy Javad
Zarif told reporters that he had been prevented from addressing the Council to
make his case.
"We have been told this was a matter of procedure but
I believe it was more than that," he said. "Iran will have to consider the
statement in Tehran and will respond accordingly."
During Wednesday's negotiations, they also agreed to
drop the language which would have vaguely linked Iran's nuclear program with a
threat to international peace and security, in a bid to get Russia on board.
The five key council members have been wrangling over
how to respond to the crisis over Iran's nuclear plan after the IAEA reported
the matter to the council in early March.
The United States claims that Iran's program is
designed to develop nuclear weapons. But Teheran insists that its nuclear
program is aimed at generating electricity and it is entitled to developing
peaceful nuclear technology under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
On Thursday, foreign ministers of the five permanent
council members and their German colleague are due to meet in Berlin to discuss
the international community's future strategy toward Iran's nuclear issue.
A presidential statement needs consensus among the 15
council members while a resolution requires a minimum of nine votes and no veto
from any of the five permanent members. Enditem
|