|
UNITED NATIONS, March 10 (Xinhuanet) -- The five
permanent members of the Security Council remained bitterly divided over how to
respond to Iran's nuclear crisis, after their UN envoys held a second round of
private discussions on Friday afternoon.
At issue are elements of a draft council presidential
statement proposed by Britain and France, said diplomats attending the 90-minute
meeting at the U.S. mission to the United Nations.
Russia, which is a permanent council member along
with Britain, France, the United States and China, insisted the British-French
proposals can not serve as a good basis for consultations, they said.
Among the proposals, Russia is particularly opposed
to a stringent 14-day deadline for Iran to comply with demands of the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), including suspension of its uranium
enrichment activities.
The diplomats revealed that Russia suggested a 60-day
deadline and the United States came up with a compromise of 30 days.
Britain and France are expected to water down their
proposals and put forward a new shorter text early next week.
The diplomats said the existing text calls on the
IAEA to "report to the Council within 14 days on the implementation by Iran of
the actions it has requested."
"We had a good discussion," Chinese UN Ambassador
Wang Guangya told reporters. "We talked about our objectives, how the Security
Council can reinforce the role of the IAEA."
But he declined to go into details.
The five powers met for the first time late Wednesday
after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) concluded a meeting in
Vienna on IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei's assessment report on Iran's
controversial nuclear program.
The IAEA's Board of Governors decided in a Feb. 4
resolution to report Iran's controversial nuclear plan to the Security Council
after its meeting in early March. The council has received ElBaradei's
assessment report.
Iran insists that its nuclear program is solely for
peaceful purpose, but the United States claims that Tehran is secretly
developing nuclear weapons.
In his assessment report, ElBaradei said the IAEA has
not seen any diversion of Iran's declared nuclear materials to nuclear weapons
or other nuclear explosive devices.
But he also deplored the fact that insufficient
information provided by Iran had impeded the agency's verification work in the
past three years.
"Uncertainties related to the scope and nature of
Iran's nuclear program have not been clarified after three years of intensive
agency verification," he said. Enditem |