|
กก SEOUL, Jan. 10 (Xinhuanet) -- A special panel of the Seoul National
University (SNU) Tuesday concluded that South Korea's embattled researcher Hwang
Woo-suk's two papers on human embryonic stem cells were both fabricated.
The panel made the conclusion in its final report
released at a televised press conference on Tuesday on probing the authenticity
of Hwang's stem cell researches.
In the paper published in February 2004 by the U.S.-
based journal of Science, Hwang's team claimed it successfully cloned human
embryo and extracted a stem cell line from it for the first time in the world.
Hwang's team claimed in the paper published by
Science in May 2005 that it successfully produced 11 patient-tailored stem cell
lines. The development cited in the paper was widely viewed as an important
progress in therapeutic cloning research.
The nine-member panel judged in the final report that
data used in the 2004 paper was based on ovum's "parthenogenesis mutation" that
may be cultivated accidently.
"We reached a conclusion that DNA printing and stem
cell photos used in the 2004 paper contained fabrications," Chung Myung-hee,
head of the special panel, said at the press conference.
The 2004 paper made Hwang the first class scientist
in the stemcell research field in the world.
While, at the same time, the panel reaffirmed its
previous tentative conclusion in the final report that all the data showed in
Hwang's 2005 paper are fake.
The panel also said Hwang's previous allegation that
his team holds "core technology" of producing stem cells lacked practicality.
"There was no scientific evidence that Hwang had
produced stem cells," said Chung.
On the issue of how many ova Hwang's team used in its
researches, the panel said it found much more ova than Hwang's team claimed in
the two papers were provided for the researches.
The panel said during November 2002 to November 2005,
four local hospitals procured 2,061 ova from 129 donors and provided the ova to
Hwang's team.
Hwang had claimed his team used 242 human eggs to
successfully make one stem cell in the 2004 paper, and 185 eggs to produce 11
individually tailored stem cells in the 2005 paper.
The panel pointed out that at least 273 ova were used
by Hwang's team for the 2005 paper, not 185 as it claimed.
However, the panel verified the authenticity of the
world firstcloned dog - "Snuppy", which was made by Hwang's team in 2005.
"Snuppy was confirmed to have been cloned from
somatic cells ofa dog," said Chung.
The panel's report also recommended the SNU to take
disciplinary action to all people involved in Hwang's research dueto the
"serious data fabrication."
Stem cells are primal undifferentiated cells which
retain the ability to differentiate into other cell types. Medical researchers
believe stem cell research has the potential to find new way to treat
hard-to-cure diseases by developing stem cells tospecific tissues or organs.
The controversy over Hwang's study erupted when a
local TV station reported in last November that the scientist's team had used
ova paid for by a local hospital and that two of his junior researchers donated
their eggs in 2003 for embryonic stem cell research.
In late November 2005, Hwang admitted those ethical
lapses existed in his research and announced resignation from head of the World
Stem Cell Hub that opened in last October here.
The SNU launched the special panel to make
independent investigation over the authenticity controversy over Hwang's
researches in last December.
After the panel found fabrication of Hwang's 2005
paper, Hwang offered resignation from his SNU professorship in late December
last year.
Hwang and other 24 co-authors of the 2005 paper also asked Science to retract the paper in late last year. Enditem
|