|
 |
|
Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin is applauded after Martin's government was defeated by a no-confidence motion in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Monday Nov. 28, 2005. (Photo: Xinhua) |
OTTAWA, Nov. 28 (Xinhuanet) -- Canadians are facing the first winter federal election in 26 years after Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberal minority government was toppled in a non-confidence motion Monday by united efforts from three opposition parties.
The Conservatives, the New Democratic Party (NDP) and
the Bloc Quebecois banded together in forcing the Liberals down, claiming that
it has lost the moral authority to rule after being proven of misusing millions
of dollars in an advertising campaign during former Prime Minister Jean
Chretien's rule.
Martin, who first assumed power in December 2003, has
come through a tough time marked by several motions of non-confidence which he
survived, sometimes narrowly, and a snap election in June 2004, which saw him
out to become a minority government leader from a majority one.
At the center of all these political upheavals is the
federal sponsorship scandal, which came out in early 2004 and sparked widespread
discontent towards the Liberal government, whose supporting rate once dropped to
the lowest point in the last decade.
In February 2004, Auditor General Sheila Fraser
released her audit of the federal sponsorship program, asserting that about 100
million Canadian dollars (85 million US dollars) appropriated in 1993 for a
national unity program in the French speaking province of Quebec were misused,
with the sum going to Liberal-connected companies for little or no work.
Martin, who ordered an extensive investigation into
the case, has repeatedly promised to call an election 30 days after the second
report comes out in February next year.
Although the first report, unveiled earlier this
month, put most blame on Chretien and exonerated Martin of any wrongdoing, the
opposition has decided to grasp this opportunity to bring the government down.
Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper tabled the
non-confidence motion following Martin's refusal to the opposition demands to
dissolve the 38th parliament in January and hold election in mid-February.
The Liberals have lost their moral authority to lead
the nation,and the house has lost confidence in the government, claimed the
Conservatives, who got support from the Bloc Quebecois and the NDP.
The NDP's backing helped Martin survive a
non-confidence motionby a single vote in May, but the party withdrew that
support earlier this month.
The motion was approved by a vote of 171 to 133. The
Liberals now hold 133 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons. The
Conservatives have 98, the Bloc Quebecois, 53, and the New Democrats, 18.
There are four independent legislators and two vacant
seats in the House of Commons.
On Tuesday, Martin is expected to ask Governor
General Michaelle Jean to dismiss the parliament and call an election, which may
be set on Jan. 16 or 23.
Although Canadians are hoping for a more stable
majority government, recent polls show that most of them expect a minority one,
with Liberals having a better chance to win.
A Pollara poll released on Monday showed public
support for the Liberals at 36 percent, compared with 31 percent for the
Conservatives. Parties typically need to win more than 40 percent of the vote to
gain majorities in parliament.
Because Canadian parties do not form coalitions,
minority administrations need opposition backing for passage of laws. Another
informal alliance between the Liberals and the NDP may be the most likely
outcome in the January vote, observers said.
Minority governments have lasted an average 16 months
in Canada.Concerned about the adverse effects of a shaky minority government,
observers pointed out that a future Liberal prime minister's ability may be
impaired to pass corporate tax cuts, open up regulated industries to foreign
ownership or allow lenders such as Royal Bank of Canada to merge.
"There are never any fiscal merits to a minority
government," said Michael Behiels, a historian and constitutional expert of the
University of Ottawa. "Minority governments tend to spend, spend, spend."
Martin's government was forced to raise spending and
shelve corporate tax cuts to win the NDP's backing to stay in power.
In 2004, Martin raised spending by 15 percent, the largest increase in 20 years, and repealed a tax-cut package for corporations that had initially been included in this year's budget. Enditem [1] [2] [3] [4] |