|
BEIJING, Nov. 11 (Xinhuanet) -- The latest session of the
six-party talks on the Korean nuclear issue ended with a chairman's statement,
which experts say signifies all parties endeavor to translate the commitments
into actions.
 |
| Chinese delegation head Wu Dawei, central
front, reads the chairman's statement at the closing of the First
Session of the Fifth Round of the Six-Party Talks in Beijing, on Nov. 11,
2005. | The first session
of the six-party talks, the fifth since 2003, began Wednesday and focused on
"outlining details, ways and procedures for the implementation" of the landmark
joint statement, which was adopted at the fourth round of talks in September.
The chairman's statement issued Friday said the
parties reaffirmed that they would "fully" implement the joint statement in line
with the principle of "commitment for commitment, action for action."
"The statement shows that the talks have got a
clearer focus and are drawing closer to the actual actions," said Liu Jiangyong,
expert on international studies of Tsinghua University.
The talks group China, the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea(DPRK), the United States, the Republic of Korea(ROK), Russia
and Japan.
Chief US negotiator Christopher Hill described the
talks as "achieving benchmark," saying that the delegations of China, ROK, Japan
and Russia have all made "good approaches and positive suggestions."
China shared with other parties its "roadmap" at the
beginning of the latest session Wednesday.
Wu Dawei, China's chief negotiator, suggested that
the fifth round be carried out in phases: the delegation heads of the six
nations first table a general scenario and a working group or expert panel works
out detailed rules and submit them to the delegation heads for consultations.
Head of the Japanese delegation Kenichiro Sasae
Friday hailed the chairman's statement, saying it gave full consideration to the
interests of all parties and would help implement the joint agreement in a
comprehensive and rapid manner.
Earlier, Sasae proposed setting up "two working
groups "specializing respectively in DPRK nuclear dismantlement and inspection,
and economic and energy aid to the DPRK.
Qin Gang, spokesman for Chinese delegation, told a
press briefing Wednesday that it might be an "appropriate choice" to setup
working groups or expert teams so as to implement the joint statement.
"It will be more easier to reach consensus within
working groups than in the plenary session as working groups tend to be more
efficient," said Ruan Zongze, deputy director of the China Institute of
International Studies.
But the positions of the two primary actors, the DPRK
and United States, remained widely apart.
``We have raised very seriously the financial
sanctions which were imposed by the U.S. on (North Korea),'' Kim Gye-Gwan,
DPRK's chief delegate, told reporters after three-days of negotiations Friday.
Washington imposed sanctions in October on some North
Korean companies.
"These kinds of sanctions are in violation of the
joint statement we have adopted and is going to hinder the implementation of the
commitment we have made," Kim said.
Chief US negotiator Hill repeatedly told reporters
during the latest session that DPRK did not stop running its nuclear facilities
after the landmark joint agreement. He reiterated the US position to urge the
DPRK to abandon its nuclear weapon and uranium enrichment programs at an early
date.
Yet there is still ground for the two parties to
build up trust.
" The DRPK and the United States have focused
discussion on confidence building," Kim said, adding that the two parties
"addressed each other's concerns and will take steps in phased manner."
"There will be technical meetings and discussions" in
the near future, Hill told reporters.
The DPRK and the US have agreed to hold bilateral
talks to solve the financial sanction issue and other issues, Kim noted.
Kim also called on all concerned parties to take
simultaneous actions to narrow the differences.
The Parties agreed to hold the second session at the
earliest possible date, chairman's statement said. Enditem |