|
VIENNA, Aug. 12 (Xinhuanet) -- The International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors expressed "serious concern" on Thursday over Iran's decision to resume uranium conversion but stopped short of referring the issue to the UN Security Council.
The agency's restrained response made it clear that
the West wants to give diplomacy more time to defuse the new round of tension
triggered by Iran's unilateral move earlier this week.
However, a Vienna-based diplomat said Iran and the
European Union (EU) need more sincerity and patience in the future to bridge
their differences.
The IAEA started meeting at its headquarters on
Tuesday but adjourned to allow member states time to hold backstage meetings on
the text of a resolution.
The 35-nation board was divided. The EU believed that
Iran had violated the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) while non-aligned states
questioned the opinion, arguing that Iran's suspension of uranium enrichment
last November was voluntary. At the same time, several countries insisted that
the UN Security Council be involved.
China's UN Ambassador in Vienna Wu Hailong called on
the concerned parties to continue negotiations with patience, pragmatism and
flexibility till reaching a solution acceptable to all sides.
He warned against actions that would further
complicate the situation.
Malaysian Ambassador Rajmah Hussein, speaking for the
Non-Aligned Movement, urged the Europeans and Iran to continue with their
dialogue and said verification issues "should be resolved solely within the
framework of the IAEA."
After three days of intense negotiations, the board
approved the resolution urging Iran to suspend all nuclear fuel-related
activities without mentioning the Security Council for fear that such a move
could backfire.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei was requested to provide
a comprehensive report on the implementation of Iran's NPT Safeguards Agreement
and the resolution by Sept. 3, 2005.
Iran, which insists that its nuclear program is
peaceful and geared only toward generating electricity, responded with
indignation.
"This resolution is politically motivated and has
been approvedunder the pressures of the United States and its allies and is void
of any legal or rational basis, and (therefore it) is unacceptable," Foreign
Ministry spokesman Hamid-Reza Asefi said.
Although Iran remained defiant, its senior nuclear
negotiator Cyrus Nasseri said in Vienna that the country still keeps the
dooropen for negotiations.
Tehran voluntarily halted all sensitive atomic work
at a conversion facility in Isfahan, 400 km south of the capital, in November
2004 after reaching a deal, called the Paris Agreement, with the EU trio of
Britain, France and Germany.
But earlier this week, Iran rejected the EU's offer
of political and economic incentives if it permanently abandoned enriched
uranium fuel production, calling the offer "an insult to the Iranian nation for
which the EU3 must apologize."
On Wednesday, Tehran completely removed IAEA seals at
the Isfahan facility where UN nuclear inspectors installed surveillance cameras.
Since the late 1950s, Iran has invested hundreds of
millions ofUS dollars in its nuclear program and set up six research centers and
five uranium conversion facilities.
Regarding the nuclear technology as a national pride,
Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, said this week
in Tehran that the West must accept the reality that Iran is a nuclear energy
country.
On the other side, the EU countries, while deeply
worried aboutIran's nuclear ambition, are unwilling to see Iran's nuclear
issuefurther complicated.
Under the NPT, Iran may process and enrich uranium
for peacefulpurposes. However, the EU trio says the only way to prove
peacefulintentions is to renounce all technology that could be used to make atom
bombs.
The IAEA board's next regular meeting is slated for
Sept. 19, but members can call emergency meetings at any time.
Analysts said that although the standoff was
temporarily eased, it is hard for the EU and Iran to reach compromises in the
short term and finding a solution will be a long and volatile process.
They did not rule out the possibility that the issue
will be referred to the Security Council if the situation aggravates.
Enditem |