|
IX. Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
In recent years, the Chinese procuratorial organs
have earnestly exercised their duties of examination of arrests and prosecutions
in cases of criminal IPR infringement, as well as legal supervision over
relevant criminal lawsuits in accordance with law, handled a large number of
cases of suspected criminal IPR infringement. From 2000 to 2004, the
procuratorial organs at all levels approved the arrests of 2,533 people
suspected of criminal IPR infringement, and instituted prosecutions against
2,566 suspects. In 2004, the arrests of 602 people suspected of criminal IPR
infringement were approved, and prosecutions against 638 suspects were
instituted. In the same year, procuratorial organs around China launched a
special drive to supervise cases involving production of fake products and IPR
infringement, duringwhich they urged relevant administrative law enforcement
organs totransfer suspected criminal cases to public security organs according
to law, supervised the filing of cases that should have been filed by the public
security organs according to law, made sure that suspected criminal cases
entered judicial proceedings in time, and investigated some criminal cases of
conniving and covering up production and sale of fake products and of IPR
infringement involving government functionaries abusing their powers.
For many years, the Chinese people's courts at all
levels have continuously strengthened work in IPR-related civil and criminal
trials under the principle of "justice and efficiency." Through handling a large
number of IPR-related cases, they have protected the legitimate rights and
interests of Chinese and foreign IPR proprietors equally, punished acts of IPR
infringement and severely cracked down on criminal IPR infringements, making
unremitting efforts to realize social fairness and justice.
Since the handling of the first case of a technological contract dispute in 1981, the Chinese courts have continuously expanded the range of IPR-related trials to include cases concerning copyright, trademarks, patents, unfair competition, computer software, new varieties of plants and integrated circuit layout designs, thus establishing the status of court trials in the handling of IPR-related cases. From 1998 to 2004, courts throughout the country concluded 38,228 IPR-related civil cases offirst instance and 2,057 criminal cases of first instance involving IPR infringement in accordance with Section Seven, Chapter III of the "Specific Provisions" of the "Criminal Law," handing down sentences to 2,375 criminals. Among these cases, in 2004, 8,332 civil IPR-related cases of first instance and 385 criminal cases of first instance involving IPR infringement in accordance with Section Seven, Chapter III of the "Specific Provisions" of the "Criminal Law" were concluded, and 528 criminals were punished. In the same year, the Chinese courts alsoconcluded 932 criminal cases of production and sale of fake or inferior goods, punishing 1,453 criminals involved, and concluded 1,434 criminal cases of illegal business operation, punishing 2,103 criminals. A considerable proportion of the above two types ofcases also involved criminal IPR infringement. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] |