|
BEIJING, Mar. 24 -- The "three-good" student honour
system is being revamped after 50 years extolling the virtues of good morals,
hard study and sporting excellence.
Several Chinese cities are piloting a new programme
because the current system which was introduced in the 1950s and promotes and
rewards "model tri-merit" pupils who excel morally, academically and physically
is drawing increasing criticism.
 |
| Students and teachers with Dongshan Primary School
in Yichang, Hubei Province, apply a new system to encourage students to
help others. This photo was taken on November 9, 2004. (Photo:
chinadaily.com.cn) | "A
good student needs to be a good child within the family and a good citizen in
society first," said Tan Renjie, director of the Education Bureau of Wuhan,
capital city of Central China's Hubei Province.
The city is leading reforms and recently introduced a
new "good student" programme, which includes studies and tests on three new
aspects society, school and family.
"The new criteria is an extension of the old
'three-good' student awarding system, adding more practical assessment factors
to promote students' self-discipline," Tan said.
Community service and "social practice, ability to
arrange one's own daily life, work and rest on schedule, no money-spending
sprees, respecting the elderly, good learning habit and teamwork spirit" are all
taught.
Students start with self-assessments and are then
appraised by their fellow students and teachers each semester.
"We want them to become good citizens, good students
and good children," said Tan.
Since the issue was brought up last year, a number of
schools in Shanghai, Beijing and some other cities are also putting emphasis on
students' learning to grow as good citizens.
Critics say the "three-good system" is an
elitist-throwback programme to the 1950s and rewards only a few students
unfairly.
Pupils are regularly promoted and demoted according
to their moral and "virtuous" behaviour, academic performance and physical
prowess in sports.
When it was introduced in the 1950s, it was seen as
force for good.
But the see-saw affect is today blamed for
demoralizing many students and causing divisions in the classroom.
"The system becomes a bottleneck in promoting
democracy in education because only a very small number of students can be
awarded the title," said Gu Mingyuan, a professor with Beijing Normal
University.
"The 'three-good student' award system brings more
pressure on students and harms their mental health," Gu said.
Beijing high school student Xiao Xiao agrees.
He said: "This award gives students more harmful
pressure than benefits.
"When I was awarded the 'three-good' title, I was
envied by others, but when I lost the title, I felt very unhappy."
"It is hard to measure a student's morals and virtue
attributes. And those with high physical education scores cannot readily be
regarded as a person with other good qualities," Gu said.
In recent years, rising competition for high-school
places has seen middle and primary schools focus on academic ability, turning
out what educators are calling "one-good" students.
"Today, the most docile students with high academic
scores often become 'three-good' award candi-dates," said Gu.
The Ministry of Education said it has been
considering a more "down-to-earth" education curriculum, and introduce the all
important moral education through daily activities such as helping with chores
at home and in communities, ministry sources said.
(Source: China Daily) |