|
BEIJING, March. 9 -- In late February, US President
George W. Bush made his first trip to Europe since being re-elected. It
demonstrated to the world the common ground between the United States and its
European allies and the "harmony" in cross-Atlantic relations.
However, Bush's trip could not
conceal the deep divide between the two traditional allies on a wide range of
issues.
The United States and European Union (EU), whose ties
were seriously compromised by the Iraq War, have been in a bitter quarrel over
the postwar reconstruction of Iraq, the Iran nuclear issue, the Middle East
peace process, and the EU's arms embargo upon China.
Besides the deep rift over these political issues,
the United States and the EU have also been having an ongoing, sometimes fierce,
debate on some high-tech issues, with both sides showing no willingness to
compromise.
The EU has already posed an unprecedented challenge
to the United States in the fields of aviation and aerospace, ones in which
Washington has had an overwhelming superiority for a long time.
Currently in the world's civilian aircraft
manufacturing industry, the EU's Airbus and Boeing from the United States are
competing fiercely.
To assist Airbus in improving its capabilities in
technological research and development, the EU has decided to annually give to
the aircraft manufacturer about one-third of its budget for technological
development and innovation.
With such massive financial aid, Airbus has already
got an advantage over Boeing in terms of developing new types of planes and its
share of the world market has also increased.
For example, Airbus took the lead over its competitor
in 2003 and 2004 with the number of annual deals.
In 2005, the EU's aircraft maker also became the
first to manufacture the world's largest passenger plane, the A380.
Annoyed by such moves, the United States has stepped
up its financial assistance to Boeing. It has been putting constant pressure on
the EU for it to stop giving subsidies to Airbus' technological innovation and
development.
After the EU refused to do so, the United States
filed a complaint to the World Trade Organization, demanding the bloc suspend
its "unfair subsidy" to Airbus.
In the field of aerospace, the successful launch of
Ariane-5 Rocket onto the moon signalled a new breakthrough by the EU in this
field, making itself the strongest competitor of the United States in the
world's aerospace launch market.
At the same time, EU members have been co-operating
to research and develop the Helios II A satellite, a new-generation
reconnaissance satellite that can be used in target positioning and information
warfare.
The EU's research and development of the new
satellites fully demonstrates its intention of improving its common defence
ability through high-tech means.
In the field of new energy, the EU has been pushing
forward an ambitious plan of electricity generation through applying nuclear
fusion technology.
As early as in the 1980s, the European Community
began to work in this field and has always taken the lead over other countries.
Currently, the EU, the United States, Russia, Japan,
the Republic of Korea (ROK) and China are discussing building an International
Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER).
So far this multilateral co-operative high-tech
project is the world's biggest in terms of cash.
Once completed, it would resolve once and for all the
energy shortage that has been plaguing mankind.
Talks about the project have reached an impasse
because of different stances among the relevant parties.
The United States, Japan and the ROK propose that the
reactor be built in Japan, whilst the EU, China and Russia insist it should be
set up in France.
In the field of space navigation technology, the
United States and the EU are also competing.
The United States has taken the first step in
developing and deploying the Global Positioning System (GPS).
However, the EU's launch of the Galileo system, a
satellite-based navigation system, has shown its plan to free itself from
excessive dependence upon the United States in this high-tech field.
But the United States has threatened it would
possibly knock out the European system in a time of war.
These threats achieved nothing and encouraged China
and Russia to participate in the programme in a bid to complete it as soon as
possible.
The EU's unwillingness to make concessions to the
United States in these high-tech fields fully demonstrates its intention of
co-operating with its members and trying to become an equal to the United States
in the world's political arena.
In fact, the EU has never given up this goal since
the launch of the European Retrievable Carrier Project in mid 1980s.
Undoubtedly, US-EU competition in high-tech fields
ushers in a new trend in cross-Atlantic Ocean relations.
It will have a profound effect on future Europe-US
ties and even ties between the world's major powers.
If some breakthroughs in high-tech fields are made,
the EU will inevitably raise its economic and military strength, which will
alter its reliance upon the US in defence, and thus give it more of a say in
strategy.
For example, the Galileo plan,expected to create a
profit of 80 billion euros (US$105.6 billion) for Europe and provide 150,000
jobs between 2008 and 2020, will provide a technological guarantee for the EU
for its joint defence system, thus helping form a more independent and powerful
bloc.
The EU's co-operation with China and Russia involving
the ITEA and the Galileo project will not only help enhance mutual trust between
them and expand their common ground, but will also help them consolidate their
agreement on the establishment of a multilateral world and a new international
order.
Delicate psychological changes among the Europeans
are expected to happen.
The challenges EU countries pose to the United States
and the advantages they enjoy in these fields will help them increase
self-reliance and produce a regional identity, thus further pushing forward
European integration. Enditem
(Source: China Daily)
|