|

JAKARTA, Nov. 6 (Xinhuanet) -- A team of Indonesian
scientists has refuted a claim that the skeleton of a dwarf-sized human species
recently found on the remote island of Flores would rewrite the evolutionary
history of the mankind, reports said Saturday.
Speaking about the skeleton discovered in a limestone
cave at Liang Bua, a paleoanthropology professor from Yogyakarta-based Gadjah
Mada University, Teuku Jacob, said the skeleton was not that of a member of a
novel race dubbed Homo floresiensis by Australian scientists Mike Morwood and
Peter Brown, who announced their discovery last week.
"The skeleton is not a new species as claimed by
these scientists, but simply a fossil of a modern human, Homo sapiens, that
lived about 1,300 to 1,800 years ago," Jacob was quoted by The Jakarta Post
newspaper as saying.
He said the skeleton was of a member of the
Australomelanesid race, which had dwelled across almost all of the Indonesian
islands.
"So, if they (the Australian scientists) say the
skeleton was the ancestor of the Indonesian people, forget it," he added.
He acknowledged, however, the skeleton was indeed
dwarf-sized with a minuscule brain, and therefore, was different from common
Homo sapiens.
Jacob said the relatively smaller size of the
skeleton was a result of the inciter evolution, which took place as an impact of
the environment -- tiny islands -- in which the species had been living in.
"The brain volume of this human being is estimated at
about 380cc, while the brain volume of a normal Homo sapiens is 1,300 cc for
females and 1,400 cc for males. With such a small brain size, it's actually even
smaller than that of a chimpanzee," said Jacob.
The Australian scientists said in the journal Nature
on Wednesday of last week that the species is thought to be a descendent of Homo
erectus, which spread out from Africa to Asia about 2 million years ago.
It became isolated on Flores and evolved into its
dwarf form to conform with local conditions, such as food shortages, they said.
The Australians made the discovery together with
their Indonesian colleagues.
Contradicting the Australian claim, Jacob said the
skeleton wasthat of a male who died when he was 30.
"This finding is based on the shape of the eye socket
and the curves of the hip bone, which are more like a male's," Jacob explained.
He also criticized the announcement of the discovery
without the consent of the Indonesian archeologists who participated in the
work, saying it was unethical.
A similar note was also expressed by Soejono, the
head of the National Archeology Institute, who said the Australians should have
involved them when making the announcement considering that none of the
Australian scientists were present at the time of the discovery.
Soejono said Indonesian archeologists started the
research workback in 1976 but were forced to halt it in the wake of the 1997
financial crisis.
"We continued the research later on by involving a
team from Australia before we discovered the skeleton in September. We didn't
immediately announce it because we needed to study the fossil," said Soejono.
The two Indonesian archeologists said that the
skeleton could not be considered a fossil, but a sub-fossil.
"We would call it a fossil if everything has
hardened. But we were able to find soft tissue so that we could carry out a DNA
test. We couldn't do that if it was already a fossil," said Soejono.
Enditem |