www.xinhuanet.com
XINHUA online
CHINA VIEW
VIEW CHINA
 Breaking News One wounded in rocket attack in central Kabul    SENIOR COMMANDER OF FORMER IRAQI REPUBLICAN GUARD CAPTURED    Urgent: Sharon, Peres spar on coalition government talks    Urgent: 11 killed in US air strike in Fallujah    Urgent: Palestinian intelligence offices set fire: al-Jazeera     PHILIPPINES TO WITHDRAW REMAINING TROOPS FROM IRAQ ON MONDAY    
Home  
China  
World  
Business  
Technology  
Opinion  
Culture/Edu  
Sports  
Entertainment  
Metrolife  
Travel  
Weather  
  About China
  Map
  History
  Constitution
  CPC & Other Parties
  State Organs
  Local Leadership
  White Papers
  Statistics
  Major Projects
  English Websites
  BizChina
- Conferences & Exhibitions
- Investment
- Bidding
- Enterprises
- Policy update
- Technological & Economic Development Zones

   News Photos Voice People BizChina Feature About us   
Xiaoxiao sues Nike over copyright
www.chinaview.cn 2004-07-16 09:48:55

    BEIJING, July 16, (Xinhuanet) -- Claiming copyright infringement, a Beijing designer is suing Nike over an television ad broadcast around the world, according to Friday's China Daily.

 

Zhu Zhiqiang, a Chinese designer widely known as Xiaoxiao on the Internet, said the stickman in a recent advertisement of Nike pirated a logo of his serial Flash works. [newsphoto]
    "The stickman in a recent advertisement of Nike pirated a logo of my serial Flash works," 28-year-old Zhu Zhiqiang said.

    Zhu, who is widely known as Xiaoxiao on Internet, asked for 2 million yuan (US$240,000) in compensation from Nike as well as public apologies.

    Flash is computer software often used to design cartoon characters.

    The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court held the first hearing Thursday.

    Sources with the famous sports wear company denied the charge.

    "The small man figure created by the plaintiff and his gestures are absolutely different from Nike's stickman," said Nike's lawyer Zhang Zaiping.

    "I was told by friends last year that my logo had been used by Nike in its advertisement overseas," he said.

    The ad was also broadcast in domestic television stations, Zhu said.

    "My commercial interests out of the logo, which was registered in the year 2000 for copyright protection, have been severely damaged due to Nike's illegal use." .

    Zhu said he was negotiating with a publisher to release a book based on the birth of the little man logo when the Nike advertisement was first broadcast in Beijing last year.

    "Negotiation stopped due to the advertisement," he said.

    Zhang, the intellectual property rights (IPR) agent representing Nike, said in court Thursday that Nike takes IPR very seriously.

    "As one of the world biggest sports wear producers, Nike is devoted to protection of IPR and respects others' rights."

    He said the stickman was independently designed by the advertisement company Wieden & Kennedy in 2002. Nike spent some 25 million yuan (US$3 million) on the design.

    "According to agreement between Nike and the designer, Nike owns the copyright of the advertisement," Zhang said.

    "It is obvious that the plaintiff intended to promote himself and his Flash works by accusing a famous multi-national company," he said.

    Zhu did not deny the charge Thursday but said Nike wanted to use the logo to boost the company's popularity among young people.

    "This is because my logo and works are well-known in that group," he said.

    Zhu first started using the small stick man in 1989 when he was still a student, the indictment said.

    He said he was one of the first people in China to use Flash.

    "My Flash works are so warmly welcomed by netizens that I have received more than 30,000 letters from them since 2000," Zhu said.

    Nike, however, holds Zhu's stickman cannot be protected by copyright because it lacks originality, Zhang said.

    The law says originality refers to independent design, instead of copying others' works or images in public domain, he said.

    "From mural and stone paintings in ancient times to Sherlock Holmes stories, the logo has been used repeatedly," he said.

    "This is obviously a logo usually used in the public domain."

    The court reached no decision Thursday. Both parties are now waiting on a date to be set for the next hearing. Enditem

(China Daily)

  Related Story
Copyright ©2003 Xinhua News Agency. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.