BEIJING, Dec. 28 (Xinhuanet) -- Constitutional revisions are meant to regularize the valuable experience of China's reform and opening-up, and to bring it in line with the common ideology of the nation, said Pang Xianzhi, a
constitutional expert of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
"A constitution is not about
foretelling the future," the ideological guru said about the third round of
amendments to China's Constitution five years ago.
The past five years witnessed
rapid socio-economic progress and
helped mull over the fourth round of constitutional amendments which
topped the agenda of Chinese lawmakers. They had gathered in the past week at the National
People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee to discuss the revisions proposed by
the CPC Central Committee.
Though claiming to stick to the
principle of "maintaining the stability of the Constitution and limiting the
amendments to the most essential ones," the CPC Central Committee still proposed
14 major revisions to the Constitution, many more than in previous years.
The current Constitution, which
contains 138 articles in four chapters, was formulated in 1982, and was later
amended three times, with two revisions in 1998, nine in 1993, and six in 1999.
"The CPC central committee's
proposal is a comprehensive one," said a top legislator. It covers a wide range
of issues of public concern that were not tackled before, and the large scale of
the revisions is also related to the "democratic manner" in which the proposals
were formulated. "It reflects the work style of China's new generation of
leaders," he said.
When the CPC Central Committee
said it wanted to revise the Constitution this time, it just put forward some
basic principles without a detailed draft, and solicited suggestions from local
Party committees and people from all walks of life. After a draft had been made,
it was again passed to localities and people of various sectors again, for their
opinions.
"The proposal to the top
legislature is the brainchild of the whole Party and the whole Chinese people,"
a senior lawmaker said, noting that "the way to form the proposals was a concrete example of showing the practice of democracy and reflecting the strong leadership of the Party."