|
BEIJING, Oct 28 (Xinhuanet) -- At an evening celebrating the 17th
anniversary of the founding of the Democratic Progressive Party on September 28,
Taiwan "president" Chen Shui-bian declared the party would complete three
missions: "holding a referendum," "being re-elected" and "gaining more than half
of the seats in the 'legislative yuan'." Chen promised that, together with the
Taiwan public, the party would promote the birth of a "new constitution" for
Taiwan by 2006.
Chen's "new constitution" plan is a key step towards "Taiwan independence"
and is also a timetable for that attempt, an article in the Beijing-based
magazine Taiwan Weekly said.
Chen dished out this "time-table" due to the following reasons.
First, this is perceived as helpful to distract the Taiwan public's focus
so as to consolidate votes for himself in next year's election.
Chen's "constitution" remarks are a continuation of his "one country on
each side" and "referendum" fallacy.
Due to his poor administration, Chen's election stratagems of dividing the
opposition alliance and buying votes by taking advantage of policies failed to
work effectively. Hence, Chen had to throw out the so-called "new constitution"
remarks to divert election topics from economy and people's lives to
"re-unification" or "independence" so he can dominate the agenda, provoking
disputes between Taiwan natives and mainlanders settling down on the island and
distract the public's focus away from his poor administration.
Second, "making a new constitution and establishing a state" is inherent to
his party.
Since the 1990s, attempting to achieve the goal of "independence" by means
of "referendum" and "making a new 'constitution'," the party has been actively
engaged in the activities aimed at separating Taiwan from its motherland.
Since Chen Shui-bian took office, the trick of "gradual independence" has
been rampantly promoted. Chen's "new constitution" remarks are an inevitable
outcome of the "gradual independence" promoted since the separatist forces ruled
Taiwan.
Third, this can inspire the morale of the party to get ready for next
year's elections.
Since the party became the ruling coalition, due to corruption its
so-called "incorruptible and democratic" image has been affected.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union, which advocates immediate "independence," has
even further narrowed the political room of Chen's party.
Hence, under this circumstance, Chen had to raise more radical political
ideas.
Following Lee Teng-hui's "deadline" of "establishing an independent Taiwan
state" by 2008, Chen immediately trumpeted the accomplishment of creating a new
"constitution" by 2006, and he attempts to costume himself as a "warrior for
democracy" so as to enhance internal cohesion to the greatest extent.
Fourth, Chen has attempted to provoke the mainland side with topics related
to "re-unification or independence," furthering the Taiwan public's
misunderstanding and hostility by slandering the mainland and to win support
through "populism."
As soon as Chen's "timetable of Taiwan independence" was dished out, it was
sharply criticized by various circles on the island.
The opposition parties were all critical about Chen's remarks. The
president of Kuomintang Party Lien Chan and the president of the People First
Party James Soong criticized Chen's remarks as not only "nonsense" but
"ignorant." The Kuomintang viewed Lee's remarks of "establishing a Taiwan state
by 2008" and Chen's "new constitution" remarks as "a race for Taiwan
independence." Even Yung-Fan Chang, president of the Changrong Group, who
supported Chen during the 2000 election, criticized Chen's remarks as a
"political show."
The United States expressed its deep concern over Chen's remarks, stressing
that it took seriously the "five nots" promised by Chen when he was inaugurated.
Even within Chen's following, some people are not happy with Chen's policy
declaration, since it was not approved through democratic procedures within his
party.
Facing strong criticism, Chen again played with his old bag of tricks by
blurring topics.
On September 30, emphasizing that the final version of the new constitution
must be decided directly by the public through a "referendum," Chen changed
"promoting the birth of a new constitution by 2006" to "completing the
transformation of the constitutional government by 2006."
The spokesmen for Chen's administration also stated that "promoting the
birth of a new 'constitution'" will neither involve the issue of "re-unification
or independence," national title and flag nor affect the promise of the "five
nots."
Taiwan authorities have made all efforts to create excuses for their
separatist activities that violated the "five nots" promise.
Chen's "new constitution" remarks are extremely harmful.
First, making use of the Taiwan people's good wishes for being masters of
their own affairs, Chen pushed hard for activities of "holding a referendum" and
"promoting the birth of a new 'constitution'" under the banner of "democracy"
and "reforms," by which he attempted to define the struggle of "re-unification"
or "independence" as the struggle of "democracy" or "anti-democracy" and
"reform" or "anti-reform" so as to make his separation activities more
deceiving.
Second, "referendum" and "new constitution" not only are deceiving but can
accelerate the activities of "gradual independence."
Third, by dishing out one after another sensitive topics of
"re-unification" or "independence," Chen cannot only inspire the morale of the
separatist forces but probably deepens the Taiwan public's misunderstanding with
the motherland by confusing the facts.
Fourth, fearing being accused of "selling Taiwan" by the party, opposition
groups that usually adopt the methods of tactical containment with regard to the
Chen's topics related to "re-unification" or "independence" rather than opposing
them instinctively, would likely help pass some sensitive bills such as the
"referendum bill."
However, despite Chen's arrogant activities, due to various factors,
"promoting the birth of a new 'constitution'" could finally result in a
"confusing dream."
First, the mainland is becoming increasingly strong and the mainstream
public opinion on the island is "seeking peace, stability and development." They
are the major forces containing separation activities.
Second, the majority of the international community has adopted the
one-China principle. There is no space for promoting "Taiwan independence."
Third, due to its own strategic interests, the United States stresses that
it maintain the status quo of the Taiwan Straits, which also contains the
rampant activities of the Taiwan separatists.
Fourth, since Chen assumed office, the basic political structure of the
island - namely that the opposition parties are stronger than the ruling party -
has not been fundamentally changed.
Fifth, under the current political system of Taiwan, "revising the
'constitution'" or "making a new 'constitution'" will involve the
re-distribution of political interests, for which all interests groups will
struggle vigorously. Chen's "new constitution" remarks would most probably
become a new farce and a new source of political unrest within the island.
(China Daily) |