ĦĦĦĦNANNING, Oct. 11 (Xinhuanet) -- A recent finding in the dating of Chinese
hominid fossils has challenged the prevailing "out-of-Africa" theory regarding
the origin of modern man.
ĦĦĦĦWith a new dating method, scientists determined that Liujiang Hominid
roamed south China approximately 70,000 to 130,000 years ago, rather than 30,000
years ago or less as it was previously believed. This new finding supports the
theory that modern Chineseman originated in what is present-day Chinese
territory rather than the mainstream "out of Africa" hypothesis which held that
modern humans evolved from African ancestors alone.
ĦĦĦĦThis "out of Africa" theory, developed in 1987, is based on mitochondrial
DNA -- scraps of genetic tissue inherited exclusively from the maternal side --
that were found in ancient fossils.
ĦĦĦĦDNA is a kind of genetic fingerprint unique to every individualthat
transmits hereditary characteristics, and mitochondria can bedescribed as
"energy packs" within cells.
ĦĦĦĦThe out-of-Africa theory contends that anatomically modern man first arose
in eastern Africa about 150,000 years ago, then migrated out on a relentless
push in which the species eventually conquered the planet.
ĦĦĦĦThis suggests that waves of African wanderers helped Man to evolve smoothly
along a single path rather than branch out into starkly different genetic lines,
and so Homo erectus in Asia was replaced by Homo sapiens out of Africa about
100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
ĦĦĦĦThis theory now faces a serious challenge.
ĦĦĦĦThe Liujiang Hominid fossils were discovered in 1958 in a cave in Liujiang
County in south China's Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. The fossilized bones,
which include the skull and partial body and limbs, comprise one of the most
complete and intact skeletons for a single modern man of this kind ever
discovered in east Asia.
ĦĦĦĦThe accurate dating of the fossils will contribute to understanding man's
origin or origins, a heatedly debated issue among the international academic
community.
ĦĦĦĦThere is scientific consensus with respect to the theory that the oldest
human genus appeared on the earth at least 5 million years ago, then evolved
into Homo habilitus, Homo erectus and early Homo sapien about 100,000 years ago,
and then finally into Homo sapien, to which we, or anatomically modern man,
belong. Although few disputes remain over the origin of mankind in Africa,the
origin of modern man continues to spark intense debate.
ĦĦĦĦPaleontologist Wang Wei said,"The 8-meter thick sediment at the site where
the fossils were found can be divided into three layers. We took samples from
the three layers respectively and sent for U-series testing in the world's two
leading laboratories,Australian Queensland University and Nanjing Normal
University."
ĦĦĦĦ"The result showed the middle layer in which the skull was embedded dated
back to between 70,000 and 130,000 years ago or even earlier," Wang added.
ĦĦĦĦThe limited capacity of the commonly-used radiocarbon, or carbon-14 method,
which could date back no further than 50,000 years, had previously rendered it
impossible to achieve an accurate dating of the human fossils.
ĦĦĦĦThrough the use of the new thermal ionization mass spectrometer,which
measures the rate of decay in radioactive uranium (TIMS U-series dating), a more
accurate and larger dating range can be achieved, said Wang, who is also a
senior researcher with the Guangxi Museum of Nature.
ĦĦĦĦThe scientists dated "Liujiang Man" by measuring the rate of decay of
uranium by counting the number of thorium atoms, but instead of dating the
fossils, which are porous, they dated the sediments, which better retain
uranium, above and below the fossils.
ĦĦĦĦ"Referring to the excavation record in 1958, we confirmed thatthe Liujiang
Hominid was discovered in sedimentary breccia fragments in the middle layer,
whose age is the same as that of the fossils," Wang said.
ĦĦĦĦThe estimated age of "Liujiang Man" challenges the 15-year-old "out of
Africa" theory that holds that modern humans first appeared in eastern Africa
about 150,000 years ago, migrated out of the continent between 35,000 and 89,000
years ago, and moved across the globe to sweep aside populations, with no
inter-breeding.
ĦĦĦĦThere are still dissident scientists who insist on the multi-regional
evolution model which holds that modern man descended from several indigenous
archaic human populations in the Old World,such as the Neanderthals who resided
in Europe or from the so-called Java man or from the Peking man in Asia.
ĦĦĦĦThis alternative theory, called multi-regionalism, also holds that our
ancestors emigrated from Africa 1.5 million years ago, but differs in that it
holds that different branches in several different regions -- what is now
Africa, Europe, east Asia and west Asia -- evolved simultaneously into modern
humans through interbreeding between the regions.
ĦĦĦĦThe out-of-Africa theory seemed to have genetic support, Wang said,
referring to genetic research carried out by a Sino-Americanteam.
ĦĦĦĦThe geneticists screened more than 12,000 genetic samples (blood) of men in
163 populations from different regions in Asia --in such places as Iran, China,
New Guinea and Siberia -- for threespecific Y chromosome mutations that are
derived from a single earlier mutation seen in African populations.
ĦĦĦĦThe mutations are characteristic DNA sequences called alleles, or genetic
markers located in the Y chromosome (the male chromosome), one of the two sex
chromosomes (X and Y) which only men carry (women carry two X chromosomes).
ĦĦĦĦThe Y chromosome is considered one of the most powerful molecular tools for
tracing human evolutionary history because it remains unchanged over eons when
passed from father to son.
ĦĦĦĦThe test showed all of them carried one of the three mutations,suggesting
that every one of the men could trace his ancestry to forefathers who lived in
Africa. So they concluded modern people in east Asia could trace their roots
back to a common ancestor wholived in Africa maybe 100,000 years ago and
migrated to Asia about35,000 to 89,000 years ago.
ĦĦĦĦThe findings, appearing in the May 2001 issue of the respected US Journal
"Science", also claimed that there was no genetic evidence that modern people
(Homo sapiens) mated with archaic humans (Homo erectus) that already inhabited
east Asia, who had migrated from Africa about 1 million years ago. Homo erectus
and Homo sapiens fossils have been found in abundance in east Asia.
ĦĦĦĦ"Genetic testing is an indirect method of assessing the human evolutionary
process, while the dating of fossils is direct hard evidence. The dating of the
Liujiang Hominid proved that He lived in south China 70,000 to 130,000 years ago
or even earlier, rulingout the possibility of migration from Africa," Wang Wei
said.
ĦĦĦĦThe oldest ancient human fossils found in China are those of the
1.7-million-year old Yuanmou Hominid. And all ancient human fossils unearthed in
China share a common morphology: shovel-shaped fore-teeth, a rectangular eyepit
and a flat face, which indicate that ancient man living in China had evolved
continuouslyalong an uninterrupted evolutionary chain for 1.7 million years,
Wang noted.
ĦĦĦĦThe absence of fossils dating between 50,000 to 100,000 years ago shed
doubt on this continuity, however, and geneticists therefore presumed that
aborigines in east Asia became extinct andHome sapien, or the modern human, rose
out of Africa and migrated to the region.
ĦĦĦĦ"Our finds have validated the continuity of the evolutionary chain. Further
comprehensive research, including for example, chronology, on archaic human
relics in south China will hopefully reveal the time when modern man first
appeared in east Asia as well as shed light on the evolutionary model," Wang
said.
ĦĦĦĦEarly last year, Australian scientists analyzed DNA taken from remains
unearthed in 1974 at Lake Mungo in the state of New South Wales.
ĦĦĦĦThe analysis astonishingly revealed that neither "Mungo Man's" completely
modern skeleton nor its DNA had any links with modern human ancestors from
Africa found in other parts of the world.
ĦĦĦĦThe Australian researchers said that because Mungo Man is modern
anatomically, yet has a vanished DNA line, it means at least one group of Homo
erectus's descendants evolved outside of Africa.
ĦĦĦĦDating in May 1999 put the age of the skeletal remains at between 56,000
and 68,000 years, The previously oldest human DNA tested came from Neanderthal
remains -- a 45,000-year-old specimenin western Germany and 28,000-year-old
remains from Croatia.
ĦĦĦĦFollowing the Mungo Man finding in January 2001, the next month's "Science"
issue said Australian and Chinese scientists had madeanother important
breakthrough.
ĦĦĦĦThe scientists dated China's "Nanjing Man" as 580,000 to 620,000 years old,
further supporting a multi-regional theory. "These ages along with those from
other sites in China imply that most ofthe Homo erectus specimens there are
older than previously thoughtand perhaps do not overlap significantly with
younger Homo sapiens," Science said. Homo erectus "Nanjing Man", a skull
discovered in 1993 in Tangshan Cave near Shanghai, showed that humans evolved
inisolation in China and much earlier than previously thought.
ĦĦĦĦThe scientists believed that "Nanjing Man" and the more famous "Peking Man"
family, which had been estimated at 230,000 years old,evolved in small
communities in eastern Asia. Under the multi-regional evolutionary model, these
small communities of Homo erectus probably developed in widely separate
locations, but had some communication, which explains the DNA similarities which
developed.
ĦĦĦĦApart from the fossil evidence, Paleolithic tools excavated in China,
created according to ancestral techniques, also support the theory that modern
Chinese man is more likely to have originated in China, said Huang Weiwen, a
senior research fellow with the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and
Paleoanthropology (IVPP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
ĦĦĦĦAccording to Hou Yamei, also an IVPP expert, up until recently,the lack of
modern man's fossils in east Asia had led experts to presume that the
out-of-Africa theory was accurate, but the recentdating of the Liujiang Hominid
fossils is causing the international academic community to once again focus its
attentionon east Asia. Enditem
ĦĦĦĦby Xu Zhengfeng